Medicina Baseada em Evidências

Diretriz do Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022): orientação atualizada sobre relatórios de avaliações econômicas em saúde.

13 Jan, 2022 | 20:44h

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations – The BMJ

---

Perspectiva | O que a mais recente batalha judicial do Sci-Hub significa para a pesquisa.

13 Jan, 2022 | 11:36h

What Sci-Hub’s latest court battle means for research – Nature

---

Decisões médicas: algumas são fáceis; outras, nem tanto.

12 Jan, 2022 | 12:48h

Medical Decisions: Some are Easy and Some Not So Much – Stop and Think blog, by John Mandrola

 

Comentário no Twitter

Preventive therapy reduces the probability of a negative outcome. There are 2 big snags with preventive therapy:
1. All medical interventions come with the potential for harm.
2. Preventive therapies have modest effect sizes.
great read by @drjohnm https://t.co/Hk8VPnUv3m

— Tjasa Zajc (@zajctjasa) January 9, 2022

 

---

5 coisas que aprendemos sobre revisão por pares em revistas científicas em 2021.

10 Jan, 2022 | 12:06h

5 Things We Learned About Journal Peer Review in 2021 – Absolutely Maybe Blog, by Hilda Bastian

Conteúdos relacionados:

A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review.

M-A: Effects of experimental interventions to improve the peer‐review process – “Modifications of the traditional peer‐review process at reviewer‐level are associated with improved quality, at the price of longer duration.”

The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers?

Opinion: Peer reviewers—time for mass rebellion?

5 things we learned about peer review in 2020

Editorial: Evaluation and Peer Review During a Pandemic

---

Retrospectiva: principais artigos de 2021 sobre doenças infecciosas além da COVID.

17 Dez, 2021 | 12:06h

Year In Review: Top Non-COVID Infectious Diseases Articles Of 2021 – IDStewardship

 

Comentário no Twitter

🔥🔥NEW 🔥🔥
My new post a great collaboration w the amazing @IDstewardship
Year In Review: Top✨ Non-COVID Infectious Diseases Articles Of 2021
18 high quality 🆔 RCTs
6 RCTs @NEJM#Shorterisbetter #IDTwitter #MedEd #TwitteRx #ASPchat #SoMeDocs
Others🤔https://t.co/wJtdjYJ0Gf pic.twitter.com/ugILKX5RQO

— Antibiotic Stewa®️x🆔 Bassam Ghanem (@ABsteward) December 17, 2021

 

---

Revisão revela que as diretrizes sobre Covid são baseadas em evidências fracas.

16 Dez, 2021 | 13:05h

Review uncovers weak COVID clinical practice guidelines – CIDRAP

Estudo original: Adherence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pharmacologic Treatments of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 to Trustworthy Standards: A Systematic Review – JAMA Network Open

 

Comentário no Twitter

This systematic review found that few clinical practice guidelines for pharmacologic treatment of hospitalized patients with #COVID19 met the National Academy of Medicine standards for trustworthy guidelines. https://t.co/nOCDp4pJWx

— JAMA Network Open (@JAMANetworkOpen) December 10, 2021

 

---

Opinião | Tomadores de decisão precisam constantemente de síntese de evidência atualizada.

16 Dez, 2021 | 12:41h

Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis – Nature

---

Perspectiva | “Na pior das hipóteses, causa desinformação.” Cientistas afirmam que estudos de saúde fracos podem trazer mais prejuízos do que benefícios.

7 Dez, 2021 | 11:44h

‘It’s misinformation at worst.’ Weak health studies can do more harm than good, scientists say – Science

---

Análise | Recomendações discordantes e inadequadas em diretrizes de consenso vs. diretrizes baseadas em evidências.

6 Dez, 2021 | 16:05h

Discordant and inappropriate discordant recommendations in consensus and evidence based guidelines: empirical analysis – The BMJ

Editorial: A moratorium on strong recommendations is needed – The BMJ

Comentário: Can we trust strong recommendations based on low quality evidence? – The BMJ

 

Comentário no Twitter

NEW research finds that consensus based guidelines produce more recommendations violating the evidence based medicine principles than evidence based guidelines https://t.co/8eCGZfiNZ3

— The BMJ (@bmj_latest) November 28, 2021

 

---

Ensaios clínicos randomizados na terapia intensiva: passado, presente e futuro.

3 Dez, 2021 | 11:00h

Randomised clinical trials in critical care: past, present and future – Intensive Care Medicine

 

Comentário no Twitter

RCTs in critical care, history, major challenges & limitations, recent developments trying to solve some of these
📊conventional & novel RCTs
📊rationale for choosing methodological approach (advantages/potential disadvantages – pros/cons)@CritCareReviewshttps://t.co/kjCw7dFuou pic.twitter.com/xS9lHK4cuY

— Intens Care Med (@yourICM) December 2, 2021

 

---