Medicina Baseada em Evidências
Revisão | A maioria dos procedimentos articulares não é suportada por evidências de alta qualidade – “Há uma necessidade urgente de se priorizar as pesquisas sobre intervenções ortopédicas comuns.”
12 Jul, 2021 | 11:17hComunicado de imprensa: Most common joint procedures not backed by high quality evidence – The BMJ
Estudo original: Common elective orthopaedic procedures and their clinical effectiveness: umbrella review of level 1 evidence – The BMJ
Comentário no Twitter
This review of the 10 most common elective orthopaedic procedures suggests that most of these procedures recommended by national guidelines and used by surgeons have insufficient readily available, high quality evidence on their clinical effectivenesshttps://t.co/63B7XEXeyh
— The BMJ (@bmj_latest) July 10, 2021
Editorial | Aducanumabe para doença de Alzheimer?
12 Jul, 2021 | 11:13hAducanumab for Alzheimer’s disease? – The BMJ
Relacionado: FDA approvement of Alzheimer’s drug sparks controversy among doctors.
Comentário no Twitter
Our editorial for @bmj_latest on the controversial #Aducanumab approval and what it means for patients, clinicians and researchers.
With @seb_walsh, Richard Milne @ethicsWCS, Carol Brayne @CamPubHealth https://t.co/mnhh4F1gKK— Richard Merrick (@r_merrick) July 9, 2021
Recomendações para inclusão ou revisão de desfechos reportados pelo paciente em pedidos de bolsa para realização de estudos.
12 Jul, 2021 | 11:12hPerspectiva | “‘Bom demais para ser verdade’: dúvidas em torno do estudo que mostrou redução de 77% na mortalidade da COVID-19.”
9 Jul, 2021 | 16:00h‘Too good to be true’: Doubts swirl around trial that saw 77% reduction in COVID-19 mortality – Science (poucos artigos gratuitos por mês)
Opinião | “É hora de assumir que as pesquisas em saúde são fraudulentas até que se prove o contrário?”
8 Jul, 2021 | 09:46hTime to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise? – The BMJ Opinion
Relacionado: How a Data Detective Exposed Suspicious Medical Trials
Comentário no Twitter
"It may be time to move from assuming that research has been honestly conducted and reported to assuming it to be untrustworthy until there is some evidence to the contrary."@Richard56 considers the scale of the problem of research fraudhttps://t.co/WQVbJyqw3o
— The BMJ (@bmj_latest) July 7, 2021
Revisão crítica sobre o Altmetrics: é possível medir o fator de impacto social?
7 Jul, 2021 | 07:59hA critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor? – Insights into Imaging
Relacionado: Altmetric Score Has a Stronger Relationship With Article Citations Than Journal Impact Factor and Open Access Status: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 4,022 Sports Science Articles – Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (link para o resumo – $ para o texto completo)
Comentário no Twitter
My new paper about Altmetrics! An emergent topic in editorialism! @radiology_rsna @RadioGraphics @AcadRadiol @ajrRadiology @cannella_rob @radiologyCTI @cookyscan1 https://t.co/zadPpJi88x
— Cristina Garcia Villar (@villar_gar) July 2, 2021
Editorial | Não fique aí sentado, faça alguma coisa… mas não cause dano: os aspectos preocupantes das intervenções experimentais contra a COVID-19.
6 Jul, 2021 | 11:23h
Comentário no Twitter
Shortcutting science perpetuates ineffective/unsafe treatments: with #COVID19 plethora of interventions (most next-to-no basis/inconsistent effects) trialled or given on compassionate grounds regardless risks. Will mistakes be acknowledged & lessons learnt?https://t.co/p53WyeMLEC pic.twitter.com/zUwlML8Pft
— Intens Care Med (@yourICM) July 5, 2021
Perspectiva | Ciência, e não especulação, é essencial para determinar como o SARS-CoV-2 alcançou os humanos.
6 Jul, 2021 | 11:21hScience, not speculation, is essential to determine how SARS-CoV-2 reached humans – The Lancet
Quando o “autoplágio” é OK? Novas diretrizes estabelecem regras aos pesquisadores sobre “reciclar” textos.
6 Jul, 2021 | 11:12hWhen is ‘self-plagiarism’ OK? New guidelines offer researchers rules for recycling text – Science (poucos artigos gratuitos por mês)
Revisão | Guia do usuário para a análise de decisões médicas.
5 Jul, 2021 | 09:58hUsers’ Guide to Medical Decision Analysis – Mayo Clinic Proceedings