Medicina Baseada em Evidências
Relatório AHA | Recomendações para a divulgação de dados estatísticos na medicina cardiovascular.
27 Jul, 2021 | 10:11h
Comentário no Twitter (fio – clique para saber mais)
It's great to see @AHA_Research & @ADAlthousePhD recommend more transparent data visualization & clearer statistical reporting, and advocate for pre-registration, open data & open code in their new guidelines. I look forward to seeing this implemented.https://t.co/Wm2pmSmCbe pic.twitter.com/k0zvwYtKps
— Tracey Weissgerber (@T_Weissgerber) June 14, 2021
Perspectiva | “Challenge Trials” com o SARS-CoV-2 (quando pessoas saudáveis são expostas deliberadamente ao virus, para fins de pesquisa) – Estabelecendo um modelo durante uma pandemia em evolução.
23 Jul, 2021 | 10:17hRelacionado: World’s first coronavirus “Human Challenge” study receives ethics approval in the UK (vários textos sobre o tema) E Are SARS-CoV-2 Human Challenge Trials Ethical? – “A clinical trial is underway in the UK in which young, healthy participants are exposed deliberately to SARS-CoV-2 to assess the viral inoculum needed to produce an infection and to test vaccine efficacy”.
Opinião | Expansão das evidências científicas para o cuidado clínico de idosos: em busca de novas abordagens que possam ir além dos tradicionais estudos clínicos.
23 Jul, 2021 | 10:07hExpanding Evidence for Clinical Care of Older Adults: Beyond Clinical Trial Traditions and Finding New Approaches – JAMA (gratuito por tempo limitado)
Estudo com entrevistas anônimas mostrou que 8% dos pesquisadores já falsificaram ou fabricaram dados em pesquisas.
23 Jul, 2021 | 10:04h8% of researchers in Dutch survey have falsified or fabricated data – Nature
Estudo original e comentários: Landmark research integrity survey finds questionable practices are surprisingly common.
Relacionado: Opinion | Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise? E How a Data Detective Exposed Suspicious Medical Trials
Opinião | Crianças simplesmente não são adultos menores – É por isso que eles precisam de seus próprios estudos clínicos para uma vacina contra COVID-19.
22 Jul, 2021 | 13:02hA cura é, de fato, pior do que a doença? Os impactos dos “lockdowns” sobre a saúde durante a COVID-19 – “Enquanto se esperam certos danos oriundos das intervenções contra a COVID-19 – afinal, toda decisão tem um custo –, a possibilidade de uma epidemia não mitigada torna estas restrições menos danosas do que qualquer outra sugestão.”
21 Jul, 2021 | 09:56hComentários: Expert reaction to a narrative review looking at the health impacts of lockdowns – Science Media Centre E Lockdowns do not harm health more than Covid, say researchers – The Guardian
Comentário no Twitter (fio – clique para saber mais)
The smiley faces, cherry blossoms, Great Barrington Declaration fans, "natural herd immunity" enthusiasts & anti-maskers do not approve of our new @GlobalHealthBMJ analysis on lockdowns 😉
So, here's a long-ish thread on what we did & did not find 1/nhttps://t.co/CFtT9j44vo
— Prof. Gavin Yamey MD MPH (@GYamey) July 20, 2021
Fauci afirma que a teoria da origem natural do coronavírus ainda é a mais provável.
19 Jul, 2021 | 10:01hFauci says natural origins theory of coronavirus is still the most likely – CNN
Artigo relacionado (preprint): The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review – Zenodo
Ver também: A Group of Scientists Presses a Case Against the Lab Leak Theory of Covid – The New York Times (poucos artigos gratuitos por mês) E Leading scientists push back against Wuhan lab leak theory – The Age
Relacionado: Opinion | The Covid-19 lab leak theory is a tale of weaponized uncertainty.
Por que um grande estudo sobre ivermectina para Covid-19 foi excluído da revista onde foi publicado?
16 Jul, 2021 | 10:01hWhy Was a Major Study on Ivermectin for COVID-19 Just Retracted? – Grifter Analysis and Review
Ver também: Huge study supporting ivermectin as Covid treatment withdrawn over ethical concerns – The Guardian E Some problems in the dataset of a large study of Ivermectin for the treatment of Covid-19 – Nick Brown’s Blog E Is Ivermectin for Covid-19 Based on Fraudulent Research? – Gideon M-K; Health Nerd
Comentário no Twitter (fio – clique para saber mais)
So, one of the biggest studies to date on ivermectin for COVID-19 has issues significant enough that, if not fraud, are so serious that it invalidates the study without further explanation
I promised a thread
Here we go 1/n https://t.co/L9QOChmGtA
— Health Nerd (@GidMK) July 16, 2021
Opinião | Vacinação obrigatória contra COVID-19 para trabalhadores da área da saúde.
14 Jul, 2021 | 11:47hThe Case for Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines for Health Care Workers – Annals of Internal Medicine
Comunicado de imprensa: Case is strong for mandating COVID-19 vaccination for health care workers – American College of Physicians
Comentário no Twitter
The Case for Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines for Health Care Workers https://t.co/pdaBRZdkfG via @AnnalsofIM "The case for mandating SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for health care workers is substantially stronger than the case was for mandating influenza vaccines." I fully agree.
— Kenny Lin, MD, MPH (@kennylinafp) July 12, 2021
Pesquisa sobre a integridade de estudos mostra que práticas questionáveis são inacreditavelmente comuns.
12 Jul, 2021 | 11:20hLandmark research integrity survey finds questionable practices are surprisingly common – Science (poucos artigos gratuitos por mês)
Estudos originais (preprint): Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: a survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands – MetaArXiv E Prevalence of responsible research practices and their potential explanatory factors: a survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands – MetaArXiv
Relacionado: Opinion | Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?