Medicina Baseada em Evidências
Revisão | O valor das revisões sistemáticas e metanálises em cirurgia.
25 Nov, 2021 | 14:57hThe Value of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Surgery – European Surgical Research
Diretriz GRADE 24. Aprimoramento da integração de estudos randomizados e não randomizados de intervenções em síntese de evidências e diretrizes de saúde.
23 Nov, 2021 | 15:45h
Comentário no Twitter
🆕#gradeguidance how & when to appropriately integrate non-randomized |observational studies in your #evidencesynthesis of intervention effects & some of the implications for @GRADE_WG approach @CharlieNeck @schunemann_mac @RMorganPhD @Elie__Akl +@JClinEpi https://t.co/2pAdQShX9q
— GRADE Working Group (@GRADE_WG) November 19, 2021
“Overdiagnosis” (diagnóstico excessivo): é oficial – o termo agora está incluído no vocabulário de assuntos médicos (medical subject headings – MeSH).
22 Nov, 2021 | 09:20hOverdiagnosis: it’s official – The BMJ
Conteúdos relacionados:
Overdiagnosis: what it is and what it isn’t – BMJ Evidence Based Medicine
Overdiagnosis across medical disciplines: a scoping review – The BMJ Open
Too much medical care: bad for you, bad for health care systems – STAT News
Screening: How overdiagnosis and other harms can undermine the benefits – Health News Review
Overdiagnosis: causes and consequences in primary health care – Canadian Family Physician
Five warning signs of overdiagnosis – The Conversation
What is overdiagnosed cancer? And why does it matter? – Croakey
Blame rising cancer overdiagnosis on ‘irrational exuberance’ for early detection – STAT
A food allergy epidemic… or just another case of overdiagnosis?
An epidemic of overdiagnosis: Melanoma diagnoses sky rocket
Otimização do uso do Twitter para a disseminação de pesquisas: o estudo randomizado e controlado “Three Facts and a Story”.
22 Nov, 2021 | 09:17hConteúdos relacionados:
Perspective: How Twitter is Changing Medical Research
Keeping Up With Cardiology: Old-School Learning Versus the Twittersphere – TCTMD
Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? – Facets
Rise of the Tweetorial – Precious Bodily Fluids
Social Medicine: Twitter in Healthcare – Journal of Clinical Medicine
University of Twitter? Scientists give impromptu lecture critiquing nutrition research – CBC
What’s your doctor reading? How social media is disrupting medical education – National Post
Comentário do autor no Twitter (fio – clique para saber mais)
We wanted to⬆️engagement with @JHepatology research
🤔Hypothesis: people are ⬆️ likely to connect with the people behind the research than the research itself
🧐Plan: Randomize papers to personal story tweets or graphical abstracts
🧐Primary Outcome: paper downloads#livertwitter pic.twitter.com/rxvbGrANRp— Elliot Tapper (@ebtapper) June 1, 2021
Doação de 1 bilhão de dólares: estimativa do custo do tempo gasto pelos pesquisadores na revisão por pares.
17 Nov, 2021 | 12:44hConteúdos relacionados:
The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers?
Opinion: Peer reviewers—time for mass rebellion?
5 things we learned about peer review in 2020
Editorial: Evaluation and Peer Review During a Pandemic
Comentário no Twitter
Peer reviewers worked over 100 million hours in 2020, estimated value $1.5 billion https://t.co/tY9klsLedU Feat @ceptional pic.twitter.com/kNn1Blovxg
— Neuroskeptic (@Neuro_Skeptic) November 16, 2021
#AHA21 | Entre pacientes com fibrilação atrial intermitente, n-de-1 estudos com 466 pacientes descobriu que o álcool, e não a cafeína, aumentou o risco de eventos de fibrilação atrial.
16 Nov, 2021 | 12:30hIndividualized Studies of Triggers of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The I-STOP-AFib Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Cardiology (gratuito por tempo limitado)
Comentário: Avoiding AF Triggers Doesn’t Improve Quality of Life: I-STOP-AFib – TCTMD
Comentário no Twitter
Study found randomization to N-of-1 trial #Afib trigger testing fails to improve QOL but reduces number of Afib episodes. Testing alcohol associated with more Afib, but caffeine is not https://t.co/LElYEBUEcs
— JAMA Cardiology (@JAMACardio) November 14, 2021
Editorial | COVID está conturbando carreiras científicas pelo mundo.
15 Nov, 2021 | 13:59hCOVID is disrupting scientific careers around the world – Nature
Ver também:
Scientists count the career costs of COVID – Nature
Potentially long-lasting effects of the pandemic on scientists – Nature
A pandemia de COVID prejudicou a produtividade de pesquisadores – bem como sua saúde mental – “Pesquisas mostram que mulheres, pais de crianças pequenas e pessoas não brancas são as mais afetadas pelas disrupções causadas pela pandemia e precisam de mais apoio.”
12 Nov, 2021 | 13:44hThe COVID pandemic has harmed researcher productivity – and mental health – Nature
Série | Diversidade, equidade e inclusão na pesquisa médica.
12 Nov, 2021 | 13:32hPágina principal: DEI in medical research – Nature Medicine
Editorial: Diversity, equity and inclusion: we are in it for the long run
Artigos de opinião:
Role of funders in addressing the continued lack of diversity in science and medicine
The US National Institutes of Health approach to inclusive excellence
Promoting diversity and inclusion in STEMM starts at the top
A commitment to scientific equity from a philanthropic funder
Comentário no Twitter (fio – clique para saber mais)
Today we publish 4 comments and an editorial that launch a new series: #DEI in medical research.
Diversity, equity and inclusion are critically important if medical research is to deliver on its goal to improve human health.
A thread…
(1 of 6)https://t.co/khtyXipNOY pic.twitter.com/5EG0wXBKSt— Nature Medicine (@NatureMedicine) November 11, 2021
Perspectiva | O motivo de as práticas de autoria em revistas científicas não fazerem sentido.
9 Nov, 2021 | 12:03hWhy scientific journal authorship practices make no sense et al. – Science
Conteúdos relacionados:
Editorial: Authorship and Publication Matters: Credit and Credibility.
Opinion: No More First Authors, no More Last Authors
The authorship rows that sour scientific collaborations.