Interesse Geral
Estudo randomizado | Restrição calórica combinada com jejum intermitente (alimentação das 8 às 16 horas) não reduziu de maneira significativa a perda de peso em comparação à restrição calórica isolada em 12 meses (diferença – 1,8 kg; 95% IC, − 4 a 0,4; P = 0,11).
25 Abr, 2022 | 12:31hCalorie Restriction with or without Time-Restricted Eating in Weight Loss- New England Journal of Medicine (link para o resumo – $ para o texto completo)
Comentário: Time-Restricted Eating No Better Than Cutting Calories for Obesity – HealthDay
Conteúdo relacionado: Intermittent Fasting and Obesity-Related Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Randomized Clinical Trials – JAMA Network Open
Comentário no Twitter
As compared with calorie restriction, time-restricted eating does not produce additional benefits with regard to reduction of body weight, body fat, and metabolic risk factors. https://t.co/Ygx4zbC6QP pic.twitter.com/TGE5Pva3yS
— NEJM (@NEJM) April 20, 2022
Big Techs na atenção à saúde: quem ganha e quem perde com Alphabet, Amazon, Apple e Microsoft mirando o nicho de atenção à saúde.
21 Abr, 2022 | 12:32hCovid não revelou todos os seus segredos. Aqui estão 6 mistérios que os especialistas esperam desvendar.
21 Abr, 2022 | 12:30hCovid hasn’t given up all its secrets. Here are 6 mysteries experts hope to unravel – STAT
Opinião | Câncer de próstata de baixo grau (escore 6 de Gleason): hora de parar de chamar isso de câncer.
21 Abr, 2022 | 11:44hLow-Grade Prostate Cancer: Time to Stop Calling It Cancer – Journal of Clinical Oncology
Comentário: Doctors suggest new names for low-grade prostate cancer – Associated Press
Análise | Mudando a variedade de comida e bebida disponíveis para dietas mais magras e verdes.
19 Abr, 2022 | 12:46hChanging the assortment of available food and drink for leaner, greener diets – The BMJ
Comunicado de imprensa: Changing products on offer in shops and restaurants can lead to leaner, greener diets – BMJ
Opinião | A grande ideia: deveríamos desistir dos artigos científicos? – “Como um formato, é lento, fortalece exageros e é difícil de corrigir. Uma mudança radical das publicações poderia melhorar a ciência.”
18 Abr, 2022 | 15:23hThe big idea: should we get rid of the scientific paper? – The Guardian
Perspectiva | O conceito clássico de imunidade de rebanho pode não se aplicar à COVID-19.
14 Abr, 2022 | 17:46hComunicado de imprensa: NIH experts discuss controlling COVID-19 in commentary on herd immunity – NIH News Releases
Comentário no Twitter
Co-authored by Dr. Anthony Fauci and two other @NIAIDNews'ers
"We no longer need the elusive concept of 'herd immunity' as an aspirational goal: COVID-19 control is already within our grasp."https://t.co/kvYfpsXviB https://t.co/aaiGcb3qtL pic.twitter.com/6yrcsKbUGi
— Alexander Tin (@Alexander_Tin) March 31, 2022
Opinião | Hora de repensar o currículo científico.
14 Abr, 2022 | 17:35hTime to rethink the scientific CV – Nature
Comentário no Twitter
As institutions and funders around the world reassess their approach to researcher evaluations, there’s a growing call to revamp the academic CVs used to support applications for jobs, funding, promotions and awards. Read the @NatureCareers feature. https://t.co/ZGxrJrA1ZG
— Nature Portfolio (@NaturePortfolio) April 12, 2022
Estudo randomizado | Promoção no Twitter está associada a maiores taxas de citação de artigos cardiovasculares.
12 Abr, 2022 | 12:41hTwitter promotion is associated with higher citation rates of cardiovascular articles: the ESC Journals Randomized Study – European Society of Cardiology (link para o resumo – $ para o texto completo)
Conteúdos relacionados:
Randomized Trial: Twitter Promotion Increases Citation Rates of Cardiovascular Articles
Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results from the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial
A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor?
As scientists take to Twitter, study shows power of ‘visual abstract’ graphics
Perspective: How Twitter is Changing Medical Research
Keeping Up With Cardiology: Old-School Learning Versus the Twittersphere – TCTMD
Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? – Facets
Rise of the Tweetorial – Precious Bodily Fluids
Social Medicine: Twitter in Healthcare – Journal of Clinical Medicine
University of Twitter? Scientists give impromptu lecture critiquing nutrition research – CBC
What’s your doctor reading? How social media is disrupting medical education – National Post
Estudo de coorte | Uso de inibidores da fosfodiesterase 2 está associado a risco aumentado de eventos adversos oculares.
11 Abr, 2022 | 13:05hRisk of Ocular Adverse Events Associated With Use of Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors in Men in the US – JAMA Ophthalmology (gratuito por tempo limitado)
Comunicado de imprensa: U.S. insurance claims show strong link between ED medications and vision problems – University of British Columbia
Comentários:
Phase 4 Studies on Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors – JAMA Ophthalmology (gratuito por tempo limitado)