Educação Médica
Opinião | A grande ideia: deveríamos desistir dos artigos científicos? – “Como um formato, é lento, fortalece exageros e é difícil de corrigir. Uma mudança radical das publicações poderia melhorar a ciência.”
18 Abr, 2022 | 15:23hThe big idea: should we get rid of the scientific paper? – The Guardian
Opinião | Hora de repensar o currículo científico.
14 Abr, 2022 | 17:35hTime to rethink the scientific CV – Nature
Comentário no Twitter
As institutions and funders around the world reassess their approach to researcher evaluations, there’s a growing call to revamp the academic CVs used to support applications for jobs, funding, promotions and awards. Read the @NatureCareers feature. https://t.co/ZGxrJrA1ZG
— Nature Portfolio (@NaturePortfolio) April 12, 2022
Surfando a onda do Twitter: entusiasmo pela plataforma de mídia digital mudou a comunicação científica durante a pandemia – mas vai durar?
29 Mar, 2022 | 14:16hConteúdos relacionados:
Perspective: How Twitter is Changing Medical Research
Keeping Up With Cardiology: Old-School Learning Versus the Twittersphere – TCTMD
Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? – Facets
Rise of the Tweetorial – Precious Bodily Fluids
Social Medicine: Twitter in Healthcare – Journal of Clinical Medicine
University of Twitter? Scientists give impromptu lecture critiquing nutrition research – CBC
What’s your doctor reading? How social media is disrupting medical education – National Post
Comentário no Twitter
"[Twitter] has carried posts about a majority of the total COVID-19 literature—about 51% of journal articles on pandemic research had been mentioned in at least one tweet through May 2021" https://t.co/i4QEBE7F0m
— onisillos (@onisillos) March 25, 2022
Perspectiva | Ensinar mais sobre menos: preparando os médicos para a prática.
23 Mar, 2022 | 11:55hTeaching More About Less: Preparing Clinicians for Practice – The American Journal of Medicine (gratuito por tempo limitado)
Opinião | A ciência aberta, se feita do modo errado, vai gerar inequidades.
15 Mar, 2022 | 12:54hOpen science, done wrong, will compound inequities – Nature
Conteúdos relacionados:
Open-access publishing fees deter researchers in the global south.
Open-access Science Funders Announce Price Transparency Rules for Publishers (várias fontes sobre o tema)
A new mandate highlights costs, benefits of making all scientific articles free to read – Science
A guide to Plan S: the open-access initiative shaking up science publishing – Nature
Perspectiva | David Oliver: a Covid acabou com as conferências médicas?
25 Fev, 2022 | 14:19hDavid Oliver: Has covid killed the medical conference? – The BMJ
Perspectiva | Como banir painéis e conferências majoritariamente masculinos em encontros científicos.
22 Fev, 2022 | 15:14hHow to banish manels and manferences from scientific meetings – Nature
Taxas de publicação em plataformas de acesso livre impedem os pesquisadores no Hemisfério Sul.
19 Fev, 2022 | 13:47hOpen-access publishing fees deter researchers in the global south – Nature
M-A | Associação de programas de educação médica com necessidade de encaminhamentos.
19 Fev, 2022 | 13:40hLançamento de um índice aberto massivo de artigos acadêmicos – “OpenAlex cataloga centenas de milhões de documentos científicos e faz conexão entre eles.”
25 Jan, 2022 | 14:35hMassive open index of scholarly papers launches – Nature