Acesso livre
Acesso livre

Estudo randomizado | Em pacientes com Covid-19 grave, o cateter nasal de alto fluxo reduziu a chance de ventilação mecânica invasiva e diminuiu o tempo de recuperação clínica, em comparação à oxigenoterapia convencional.

8 Dez, 2021 | 13:16h

Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Clinical Recovery in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA

Conteúdos relacionados:

Non-invasive respiratory support in the management of acute COVID-19 pneumonia: considerations for clinical practice and priorities for research – “The two randomized controlled trials indicate superiority of non-invasive ventilation over high-flow nasal oxygen in reducing the need for intubation”.

[Preprint] RCT: non-invasive respiratory strategies in acute respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19 – CPAP reduced the composite outcome of intubation or death within 30 days; high-flow nasal oxygenation was not associated with better outcomes.


Mantenha-se atualizado em sua especialidade

 

Escolha quantas especialidades quiser.