Medicina Baseada em Evidências
Uso inteligente de recursos na pandemia de COVID-19: uma lista internacional de recomendações do Choosing Wisely.
24 Mai, 2021 | 10:59h#ACC21 – Lições do congresso do ACC 2021.
24 Mai, 2021 | 10:55hLessons from the ACC 2021 Meeting – by John Mandrola, MD
Publicações não replicáveis são mais citadas do que as replicáveis.
24 Mai, 2021 | 10:44hNonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones – Science Advances
Comentário no Twitter
Not only does misinformation flow at considerably higher velocity across the Internet than truth, but science publications without replication are cited much more than those which are replicated
New @ScienceAdvances https://t.co/aNSKyv1alq @UriGneezy @m_serra_garcia pic.twitter.com/eWWc0NZwgi— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) May 21, 2021
Vacinas contra COVID: o perigo de publicações científicas serem vistas como substitutas de agências reguladoras – “o processo de revisão pelos pares não é adequado para avaliar uma nova vacina com a mesma capacidade de uma agência reguladora.”
20 Mai, 2021 | 10:53hCOVID vaccines: the danger of journals being seen as substitute regulators – The Conversation
Relacionado: Covid-19: Sputnik vaccine rockets, thanks to Lancet boost
Editorial: Vacinação de crianças contra o SARS-CoV-2 – “Para a maioria das crianças, na maioria dos países, é difícil justificar neste momento.”
14 Mai, 2021 | 10:09hVaccinating children against SARS-CoV-2 – The BMJ
Relacionado: Pfizer COVID-19 shot expanded to US children as young as 12.
Amplo estudo com mais de 200.000 pacientes mostra que o rastreamento de câncer de ovário não reduz as mortes.
14 Mai, 2021 | 10:02hComentários: Screening for ovarian cancer did not reduce early deaths – Imperial College London E Annual screening for ovarian cancer does not save lives, study finds – The Guardian
Perspectiva | Como a Covid-19 revelou as falhas na produção de evidências científicas.
13 Mai, 2021 | 10:12hHow COVID broke the evidence pipeline – Nature
Editorial: Evidence-based medicine: how COVID can drive positive change – Nature
Relacionado: Scientists say the rush to do Covid research led to a whole lot of waste
Comentário no Twitter
The weak pursuit of evidence-based medicine during the pandemic.
Thankfully, the #RECOVERY and #SOLIDARITY collaborative trial groups led the way in rapidly accumulating pivotal data asking the right questions with large sample size https://t.co/aSAhQvq5dz @hcpearson @nature pic.twitter.com/iM956krq0Q— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) May 12, 2021
Aprovação da vacina da Pfizer contra COVID-19 para crianças norte-americanas a partir dos 12 anos de idade.
12 Mai, 2021 | 10:28hPfizer COVID-19 shot expanded to US children as young as 12 – Associated Press
Contraponto: Covid vaccines for children should not get emergency use authorization – The BMJ Opinion
Comentários: Covid-19: FDA authorises Pfizer vaccine for children 12-15 – The BMJ E Expert reaction to U.S. FDA authorising Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use in adolescents – Science Media Centre
Opinião | Covid-19: vacina Sputnik decola, graças ao impulso da revista Lancet.
7 Mai, 2021 | 10:46hCovid-19: Sputnik vaccine rockets, thanks to Lancet boost – The BMJ
Comentário no Twitter
Journals risk being used in place of regulators when they publish studies of novel vaccines that have not yet been authorised by a major regulator @DoctorChrisVT unpicks the story of the Sputnik V vaccine https://t.co/lYf7l0lXcy
— The BMJ (@bmj_latest) May 6, 2021
Perspectiva | A estranha ciência do efeito placebo segue cada vez mais interessante.
7 Mai, 2021 | 10:17hThe weird science of the placebo effect keeps getting more interesting – Vox