Medicina Baseada em Evidências
Atenção ao viés de sobrevivência no aconselhamento de carreiras científicas – “Para fins de aconselhamento de carreiras, converse com aqueles que deixaram a ciência e também com os que permaneceram.”
1 Out, 2021 | 18:27hBeware survivorship bias in advice on science careers – Nature
Estudos fraudulentos sobre ivermectina abrem um novo campo de batalha entre ciência e desinformação.
27 Set, 2021 | 13:25hOpinião | Mistura inadequada de pensamento clínico e sistêmico: vacinas em jovens.
27 Set, 2021 | 13:22hInappropriate Mixing Clinical and Systemic Thinking: Vaccines in the Young – Medium
Vídeo | Entendendo os estudos de não inferioridade: propósito, poder e armadilhas.
27 Set, 2021 | 13:11hOn Record: Understanding Noninferiority Trials: Purpose, Power, and Pitfalls – TCTMD
Artigos importantes sugerem eliminar o item raça na estimativa da função renal.
27 Set, 2021 | 12:40hEstudo 2: Race, Genetic Ancestry, and Estimating Kidney Function in CKD – New England Journal of Medicine
Comentários:
Remove Race From Equation Used to Assess Kidney Function, Researchers Say – AJMC
Comentário no Twitter
Honored to contribute to the NEW 2021 CKD-EPI #race-free #eGFR equation in our latest research published in @NEJM today. I learned a ton about equations. Importantly, the main lesson is that #race should NOT be incorporated into #biological tools. https://t.co/RvfWWwGOox pic.twitter.com/Xub23AUXht
— Amaka Eneanya, MD, MPH (@AmakaEMD) September 23, 2021
Painel de especialistas fazem recomendações contra o uso da raça na avaliação da função renal.
27 Set, 2021 | 12:39hExpert panel recommends against use of race in assessment of kidney function – STAT
Comentário no Twitter
A Unifying Approach for GFR Estimation: Recommendations of the @nkf – @ASNKidney Task Force on Reassessing the Inclusion of Race in Diagnosing Kidney Disease https://t.co/0qt8F7l9Wm (FREE)#KidneyDisease #HealthEquity pic.twitter.com/QVkMnsBA6B
— AJKD (@AJKDonline) September 23, 2021
Coleção especial Cochrane | Suspensão dos cuidados de saúde de baixo valor: priorização dos recursos na era da pandemia de COVID-19.
27 Set, 2021 | 12:10hEditorial: Making wise choices about low‐value health care in the COVID‐19 pandemic – Cochrane Library
Comentário: Choosing health care wisely when resources are scarce – Evidently Cochrane
Comentários no Twitter
📰Our new editorial @cochranecollab: Making wise choices about low‐value health care in the COVID‐19 pandemic👉https://t.co/qABVg7emRi
Linked Special Collection on low-value care: https://t.co/fstV8P8OQS#FreeAccess pic.twitter.com/h9KZGUm2kp
— Juan Franco 🏳️🌈 (@juan_francomd) September 22, 2021
Sadly, some medical interventions are in use despite evidence against them. With @Cochrane_SH, we have published a Special Collection of Cochrane reviews of Low Value Care interventions and described the issue in an Editorial. We cannot afford wasted HC. https://t.co/PXUhaMZud2
— Karsten Juhl Jørgensen (@KarstenJuhl) September 22, 2021
A lição da ivermectina: metanálises baseadas somente no resumo dos dados são inerentemente não confiáveis.
27 Set, 2021 | 12:04h
Comentário no Twitter
Flaws in ivermectin data suggest that COVID-19 meta-analyses need rethinking
Correspondence from Jack Lawrence @GidMK @K_Sheldrick and colleagues https://t.co/lUqXX9DQjO pic.twitter.com/Oh848X1VGv
— Nature Medicine (@NatureMedicine) September 22, 2021
Efetividade e ética dos incentivos a participação em pesquisas: 2 estudos clínicos randomizados.
27 Set, 2021 | 10:40hEffectiveness and Ethics of Incentives for Research Participation: 2 Randomized Clinical Trials – JAMA Internal Medicine (gratuito por tempo limitado)
Editorial: Evidence for the Ethics of Incentivizing Clinical Trial Enrollment? – JAMA Internal Medicine
Comentário no Twitter
In this study, financial incentives increased trial enrollment in one of two trials, and did not produce undue or unjust inducement or other unintended consequences in either trial https://t.co/SaCk1XinuO
— JAMA Internal Medicine (@JAMAInternalMed) September 20, 2021
Editorial | Questões de autoria e publicação: créditos e credibilidade.
27 Set, 2021 | 10:38hAuthorship and Publication Matters: Credit and Credibility – Anesthesiology
Conteúdo relacionado: When is ‘self-plagiarism’ OK? New guidelines offer researchers rules for recycling text – Science
Comentário no Twitter
Anesthesiology editors focus on authorship and publication matters in a recent editorial examining journal policies on appropriate recognition for authors and collaborators. https://t.co/2NCpTEkpQW#PeerReviewWeek21 pic.twitter.com/lYtXtZD0l9
— Anesthesiology journal (@_Anesthesiology) September 20, 2021