Bioética
Análise | Uso de linguagem que desencoraja os pacientes.
29 Abr, 2022 | 15:17hPresenting complaint: use of language that disempowers patients – The BMJ
Comunicado de imprensa: Language that belittles or blames patients is overdue for change – British Medical Journal
FDA alerta para os riscos associados aos testes de rastreamento pré-natal não invasivos – interpretação inadequada dos resultados pode levar a potenciais decisões médicas impróprias.
21 Abr, 2022 | 12:27hAvaliação das causas da disparidade de sexos nos estudos sobre insuficiência cardíaca.
21 Abr, 2022 | 12:18hEvaluation of the causes of sex disparity in heart failure trials – Heart
Comentário no Twitter
⚠️Evaluation of the causes of sex disparity in #HF trials
👉146 HF trials, which 248620 👥
👉🙋♀️ was 25.8%
👉 ⬆️% of🙋♀️ in trials assessing HFpEF(51.6%)
📂 https://t.co/eFo35GdDPG @Heart_BMJ @secardiologia @IcyfaSemi pic.twitter.com/WaCtANqaIk— Alfonso Valle (@ValleAlfonso) April 19, 2022
Imagens e artigo sob licença de http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Segurança, tolerabilidade e cinética viral durante o desafio do SARS-CoV-2 humano em adultos jovens (infectando indivíduos deliberadamente em ambiente controlado).
5 Abr, 2022 | 12:20hComentários:
Understanding COVID-19 through human challenge models – Nature Medicine
First human challenge study of Covid-19 yields valuable insights about how we get sick – CNN
First Human Challenge Trial Shows How COVID-19 Strikes – HealthDay
Conteúdos relacionados:
Scientists deliberately gave people COVID — here’s what they learnt.
World’s first coronavirus “Human Challenge” study receives ethics approval in the UK (vários textos sobre o assunto)
Comentário no Twitter
In the first #SARSCoV2 challenge study in humans, healthy adults were intranasally inoculated with virus and monitored for productive infection, symptoms, virus kinetics, antibody response and safety in a controlled setting @ChrisChiuLab #COVID19 https://t.co/b3H2ftaSFf
— Nature Medicine (@NatureMedicine) March 31, 2022
Prevalência de monitoramento por terceiros dos websites de revistas médicas.
24 Mar, 2022 | 12:04hPrevalence of Third-party Tracking on Medical Journal Websites – JAMA Health Forum
Comentário no Twitter
Interesting work in @JAMAHealthForum where the authors report that 99% of medical journals with an impact factor of 2.0 or higher expose visitors to third-party tracking by entities that work with pharmaceutical advertisers.https://t.co/ubvLQsuHeQ
— Chris Bennett, MD (@cleebennett) March 18, 2022
Estudo mostra que é factível predizer o risco de doenças comuns via genoma completo na pré-implantação do embrião humano, o que leva a preocupações éticas.
23 Mar, 2022 | 12:00hWhole-genome risk prediction of common diseases in human preimplantation embryos – Nature Medicine
Comentários convidados:
Polygenic embryo testing: understated ethics, unclear utility – Nature Medicine
The uncertain science of preimplantation and prenatal genetic testing – Nature Medicine
Conteúdo relacionado: Opinion | “The use of polygenic risk scores in pre-implantation genetic testing: an unproven, unethical practice”.
Comentário no Twitter (fio – clique para saber mais)
Preimplantation genetic testing of human embryos is a rapidly advancing field, but scientists and ethicists are calling for caution.
We present 3 articles highlighting new research and expert commentary on this controversial topic.
THREAD 🧵— Nature Medicine (@NatureMedicine) March 21, 2022
Propiciando a escolha do paciente: a opção de “decidir por não decidir” para idosos diante de decisões relacionadas à diálise.
23 Mar, 2022 | 11:40hComentário: The “Deciding Not to Decide” Option Can Improve Older Adult Patient Care – Rutgers University-New Brunswick
Opinião | A ciência aberta, se feita do modo errado, vai gerar inequidades.
15 Mar, 2022 | 12:54hOpen science, done wrong, will compound inequities – Nature
Conteúdos relacionados:
Open-access publishing fees deter researchers in the global south.
Open-access Science Funders Announce Price Transparency Rules for Publishers (várias fontes sobre o tema)
A new mandate highlights costs, benefits of making all scientific articles free to read – Science
A guide to Plan S: the open-access initiative shaking up science publishing – Nature
Bioética | A ruptura do anonimato de doadores de esperma – uma intrincada rede de direitos conflitantes.
14 Mar, 2022 | 13:30hThe rupture of anonymity for sperm donors—a tangled web of conflicting rights – The BMJ
Comentário no Twitter
Direct-to-consumer DNA testing has torn the veil separating social family and genetic heritage. This Opinion article examines how it has brought the rights of donor conceived people to information into conflict with donors’ right to privacyhttps://t.co/avX64dbnhb
— The BMJ (@bmj_latest) March 11, 2022
Desinformação: suscetibilidade, disseminação e intervenções para imunizar o público.
11 Mar, 2022 | 15:08hMisinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public – Nature Medicine
Ver também: An epidemic of uncertainty: rumors, conspiracy theories and vaccine hesitancy – Nature Medicine