Emergências e Terapia Intensiva
Estudo randomizado SILENCE | Em pacientes em fim de vida, o butilbrometo de escopolamina subcutâneo profilático reduz a ocorrência de estertor da morte (respiração ruidosa causada pelo muco presente no trato respiratório superior).
8 Out, 2021 | 11:12hEffect of Prophylactic Subcutaneous Scopolamine Butylbromide on Death Rattle in Patients at the End of LifeThe SILENCE Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA (gratuito por tempo limitado)
Editorial: Preventing Death Rattle With Prophylactic Subcutaneous Scopolamine Butylbromide – JAMA (gratuito por tempo limitado)
Entrevista com os autores: Scopolamine Butylbromide for Preventing End-of-Life Death Rattle – JAMA
Comentário no Twitter
In a randomized clinical trial among patients near the end of life, prophylactic subcutaneous scopolamine butylbromide significantly reduced the occurrence of death rattle https://t.co/e6BDI5yirY pic.twitter.com/hHfhC2iYHh
— JAMA (@JAMA_current) October 5, 2021
Estudo randomizado | Estratégia ativa para o diagnóstico de embolia pulmonar não melhorou o desfecho em pacientes hospitalizados com exacerbação de DPOC.
8 Out, 2021 | 11:07hEffect of a Pulmonary Embolism Diagnostic Strategy on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for COPD Exacerbation: A Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA (gratuito por tempo limitado)
Comentário no Twitter
Among patients hospitalized for an exacerbation of #COPD, addition of an active diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism to usual care compared with usual care alone did not improve a composite set of health outcomes https://t.co/7mOi5lOBD8
— JAMA (@JAMA_current) October 5, 2021
Estudo randomizado | Mais um estudo mostra que plasma convalescente não melhora os desfechos em pacientes criticamente doentes com Covid-19.
5 Out, 2021 | 11:32hConteúdos relacionados:
M-A: Convalescent plasma is safe but does not improve outcomes in the treatment of COVID-19.
RECOVERY Trial: No benefit from convalescent plasma in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.
Pílula da Merck contra Covid-19 é uma ótima notícia, mas pode não ser uma grande mudança.
5 Out, 2021 | 11:28hMerck’s Covid-19 pill is great news but may not be a game-changer – CNN
Vídeo | Uma pílula para COVID? Um médico explica o molnupiravir.
5 Out, 2021 | 11:26hA Pill For COVID? | A Doctor Explains Molnupiravir – ZDoggMD
Diretriz Científica AHA | Diagnóstico e tratamento de pacientes com lesão miocárdica após cirurgia não cardíaca.
5 Out, 2021 | 11:25hComunicado de imprensa: 1 in 5 adults has high levels of heart enzymes after any surgery, monitoring advised – American Heart Association
Comentário: AHA: More Screening Needed to Catch Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery – TCTMD
Hipertensão intra-abdominal e síndrome compartimental abdominal em pacientes criticamente doentes: uma revisão do passado, do presente e dos passos futuros.
5 Out, 2021 | 11:16hRevisão | Aprimoramento do cuidado de idosos criticamente doentes.
5 Out, 2021 | 11:15hOptimizing care for critically ill older adults – Canadian Medical Association Journal
[Comunicado de imprensa – ainda não publicado] Merck anuncia que o antiviral oral Molnupiravir reduziu o risco de internação ou morte em cerca de 50%, comparado ao placebo, em pacientes com COVID-19 leve ou moderada.
4 Out, 2021 | 10:38hComentários:
Expert reaction to interim analysis of oral antiviral molnupiravir – Science Media Centre
Covid antiviral pill can halve risk of hospitalization – BBC
Why Merck’s Covid-19 pill molnupiravir could be so important – Vox
Comentários no Twitter
.@DrEricDing convinced many that stopping the #molnupiravir trial early for benefit was a good idea
But it was NOT
Large body of evidence suggests that stopping early for benefit biases the results: overestimates the benefits of the treatment #EBM https://t.co/b3tHEtliO0 https://t.co/LwuCgqcY0C pic.twitter.com/vyPWc0nd37
— Kari Tikkinen (@KariTikkinen) October 2, 2021
(fio – clique para saber mais)
💡BREAKING—New oral anti-viral drug *molnupiravir* cuts risk of #COVID19 hospitalization and death **in HALF** in a randomized trial. Results so astounding that the trial is being stopped early, and Merck plans to apply for emergency authorization ASAP. 🧵 https://t.co/g8JGNzvuRg pic.twitter.com/K1SwC3QFXS
— Eric Feigl-Ding (@DrEricDing) October 1, 2021
Trombose e trombocitopenia imune induzidas por vacina: resumo da diretriz NICE.
4 Out, 2021 | 10:36hVaccine induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: summary of NICE guidance – The BMJ
Diretriz original: NICE COVID-19 rapid guideline: vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis.
Conteúdos relacionados:
Clinical features of vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis.
Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia: what we know and do not know.
Very rare cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) after AstraZeneca vaccine: a global safety database analysis – the estimated rate of TTS after the first dose was 8.1 per million vaccinees; after the second dose, the estimated rate was 2.3 per million vaccinees. (vários artigos e fontes sobre o tema)


